Bias, fairness and data quality
In short: AI models take over patterns from their data, including prejudices and gaps. If the data represents certain groups poorly, the model works worse for them.
In more detail: The model knows no morals, only statistics. If historical decisions discriminated (applications, loans), it learns that too.
In detail
- Sources: sampling bias (who was captured?), historical bias, measurement and label bias, feedback loops (recommendations reinforce themselves).
- Examples: face recognition with a higher error rate for dark skin, application filters that disadvantaged women, language models with stereotypes.
- Fairness notions: equal error rates per group, equal hit rates, equal treatment at equal qualification. They can contradict each other.
- Remedies: balanced data, evaluation separated by group, reweighting, tests (red teaming), documentation (datasheets, model cards).
- Humans in the loop: do not leave important decisions to the model alone.
- Law: the EU AI Act classifies high-risk systems (applications, credit, justice) strictly, see EU AI Act and rules for AI.
See also: Data, features and labels, Limits of AI: what models cannot do